Evolution, Again? — From a Muslim's Perspective

Four perspectives on why a Muslim might accept evolution. Scientific: microevolution, the fossil record and ERVs — the same retroviral traces at the same loci in chimpanzee and human genomes. Logical: a double standard — the atheist believes in evolution on signs yet demands mathematical proof for tawḥīd, while some Muslims do the reverse. Scriptural: the Qur'an offers not physics but a metaphysical model for reading physical observation (the “sun runs” example); Adam may be read as the father of a society developed enough to receive revelation. Public benefit: presenting evolution as an alternative to creation forces a false choice between religion and science upon the young.

Tefekkür
All Essays
Cosmology & Creation

Evolution, Again? — From a Muslim's Perspective

Four perspectives on why a Muslim might accept evolution. Scientific: microevolution, the fossil record and ERVs — the same retroviral traces at the same loci in chimpanzee and human genomes. Logical: a double standard — the atheist believes in evolution on signs yet demands mathematical proof for tawḥīd, while some Muslims do the reverse. Scriptural: the Qur'an offers not physics but a metaphysical model for reading physical observation (the “sun runs” example); Adam may be read as the father of a society developed enough to receive revelation. Public benefit: presenting evolution as an alternative to creation forces a false choice between religion and science upon the young.

Felsufi·5 min read·2024-11-12·View on Medium ↗

The text below is Felsufi's own essay in reading and reflection. It may carry approaches that differ from classical tafsīr — Sufi interpretation, synthesis with modern science, the Risale-i Nur perspective. Because it is the author's personal ijtihād, alternative classical readings exist; this text makes no claim to a single correct reading — it offers a perspective.

A subject written and spoken about hundreds of times. Many — our own circle among them — must be asking: “if the matter is this clear, why are we still debating it?” Yet we see young people still caught in the dilemma “if evolution is true, religion is false,” unaware that evolution is in fact quite compatible with religion. So we thought it worth writing once more.

Evolution has often been a source of dispute and confusion for Muslims. On this ground borrowed from the Christian world, the Catholic Church declared plainly in 1996 that evolution does not conflict with faith, while some evangelical groups and most Muslims take the Genesis account of the Old Testament literally, as a theory of creation.

In this essay I take up the arguments for why a Muslim should accept evolution, from four perspectives: scientific, logical, scriptural, and that of public benefit.

What the Scientific Evidence Points To

Three layers of evidence
TRIGGER
Microevolution
Change in within-species variation over time — observed repeatedly in the lab and in nature.
STATE
The fossil record
Broadly consistent with the theory.
ERVs and synteny
The same endogenous retrovirus traces lodged at the same loci in the chimpanzee and human genomes — among the clearest signs of common ancestry.

ERVs are inherited genetic traces of viruses that once integrated into our ancestors' DNA and were passed down through generations. Finding the same ERVs at the same synteny in two species is among the clearest evidences of a shared evolutionary process.

Being Consistent — Tawḥīd and Evolution

The same error, in two directions — a double standard
The atheist / agnostic
Believes in evolution on the strength of signs — yet demands proof of mathematical clarity for tawḥīd.
The evidential threshold shifts with the topic
Some Muslims
Accepts tawḥīd on evidence — yet awaits direct observation or a laboratory result for evolution.
The same shifting threshold, in reverse

The Qur'anic call “in kuntum ṣādiqīn” — “if you are truthful” — always presses toward consistency.

The Verses Sit More Easily with Evolution

The Qur'an also relays some of the true accounts found in the Old Testament. In relaying them it omits the details that mislead, and presents what it does relay with a careful choice of words that addresses the understanding of every age. For what is essential in the Qur'an is the passage from physics to metaphysics, knowing God by His names and attributes, and drawing near to Him in worship.

وَالشَّمْسُ تَجْرِي لِمُسْتَقَرٍّ لَهَا ذٰلِكَ تَقْدِيرُ الْعَزِيزِ الْعَلِيمِ

36:38

“The sun runs to a resting place appointed for it.” — Yā-Sīn 36:38. A geocentric observer takes his share from this phrase; a heliocentric observer takes his, reading the sun as travelling through space and drawing its system behind it. The Qur'an offers us not physics but a metaphysical model by which to read physical observation.

Looking at the verses in this light we find many indications that the human was created through an evolutionary process; a number of Muslim scholars have said as much. Some read the account of Adam allegorically, but even that is unnecessary: it suffices to see Adam, peace be upon him, as the father and prophet of a society developed enough to be addressed by revelation. There is no need to claim he was biologically the first homo sapiens.

In the verses, creation is most often expressed as a process: the creation of the cosmos, the forming of stars, the development of each human from an embryo, the evolution of societies. That this process should hold for humanity as a whole is both reasonable and necessary in view of the manifestations of the divine names. For a monotheistic and integral cosmology in the twenty-first century, common ancestry is nearly indispensable; otherwise the mind is left with a fragmented, eclectic, ad hoc picture of the cosmos.

Public Benefit — Not Forcing a False Choice

Evolution is one of the processes within the world God created; seeking to understand this art, rather than standing against it, matters greatly if our children are to grow up at peace with science. Reading the cosmos through processes rather than objects, and passing from the work to the acts, is an important approach to understanding creation.

Some figures representing religious movements did not set out to expound the foundations of biological origins — quite naturally. Wishing not to depart from the broad highway of the Muslims, that is, not to create divisions distracting from the principal aim, they preferred to avoid contentious discourse. The Risale-i Nur corpus, for instance, contends against the denial of divinity without ever taking up the theory of evolution; it opposes only the metaphysics of chance and nature created it.

To present evolution as an alternative to creation is to force upon the young an artificial choice between religion and science. Evolution is only one theory of how creation proceeds.

Muslim Scholars Who Accepted Evolution

Many Muslim scholars through history have accepted evolution; indeed even before Darwin there were views known as the “Mohammedan Theory of Evolution.” The great majority of scholars in Islamic history agree that animals and humans undergo a spiritual evolution, passing through certain animal strata in the process; some defend such a process biologically as well.

Muhammad Hamidullah · Muhammad Iqbal · Syed Ameer Ali · İsmail Hakkı İzmirli · Maurice Bucaille · Muhammad Asad · Bahaeddin Sağlam · Süleyman Ateş · Cafer Sadık Yaran · Mehmed Bayraktar · İsmail Yakıt · Shabir Ally — these have seen evolution as one way of understanding creation.

Three Arguments the Rejectionists Do Not Answer

Three Questions
What should be asked of those who vehemently reject evolution
1 · If not evolution, what?
If the papers explaining the whale's evolutionary process do not satisfy you, you should share one offering an alternative explanation.
Something must be placed on both pans of the scale; mere rejection is not an explanation.
2 · Every theory has its rejectors
Einstein and his circle have written against quantum theory for a century — this has not invalidated it.
To refute a theory one must put forward an alternative theory.
3 · Is there no macroevolution?
It is unclear precisely what in the taxonomy they reject: between species, between genera, between families?
Are the leopard and jaguar not related? The lion and tiger? The polar bear and the American black bear?

Apart from evolution, do you have any other account of _how_ living things were created by God that rests on evidence found in nature (in the created order) — or have you ever heard of one?

Sinan Canan

Conclusion

Evolution can be a confusing and at times frightening subject for many. Yet understanding this process, resolving the contradictions, and grasping how the cosmos God created actually works offers us, as Muslims, a deeper reflection and a more consistent approach. Accepting evolution as one of God's processes of creation frees us from dual thinking and doublethink.

Evolution is God's art; and natural selection a mechanism of selection working toward an end, by a divine purpose.

About the author · the series
This text is Felsufi's own view, linked to its original publication on Medium. It is the second of three essays on the site treating evolution; the others are Evolution, Belief and the Pictures in Our Minds (2025) and, not yet added, Evolution is a project for spreading irreligion! (2025). The list of scholars and the assessment of the Risale-i Nur are the author's own selection and reading.
With Gratitude to the Author

This essay appears on QuranCodex with the verbal permission and generosity of Felsufi. All interpretations and syntheses reflect the author's personal reflection; QuranCodex carries these texts respectfully as an invitation to think. The original text is published on Medium.